Differences Between Problem-Based Writing and Argument-Based Writing

Many of the argument-based writings I've done in previous English classes have been focused around a 5-paragraph essay format; the first paragraph was the introduction, the following three paragraphs each expanded on a specific idea relating back to the argument, and then the last paragraph summarized everything that had been said and related it all back to the main argument. In IMRaD format, however, many things are different.

For example, instead of having ideas formed around paragraphs, the main ideas are grouped into sections which are then expanded upon with sentences and graphs and pictures with citations. These sections typically have headings explaining the focus of that section. This helps the reader of the article skim the paper or skip around within it and still know generally what is being said.

Another notable difference between these two genres of writing is that the problem-based writings are meant to be scanned for facts, not perused for details. On the other hand, the language of argument-based writings can make or break the persuasion. The fluidity of the language and the flow of the paper is almost more important than what is actually being said, which is the complete opposite of the purpose of problem-based writing.

Additionally, problem-based writing is focused on filling in the gaps of knowledge in a certain area of study while argument-based writing simply tries to make a point.

Finally, my previous English classes had the format of my papers follow the MLA standards while IMRaD format requires APA format. This accounts for the slight differences in citations, references, margin size, and titling, to name a few.